Time to stop this Radical Muslim Hatred. Saudi Arabia is Dubia Network and is broadcasting this garbage all over the world. The program is called Khaybar Khaybar, Ya Yahud, Jaish Muhammad sa Ya'ud. Which means "Khaybar, Khaybar, O Jews, the army of Mohammed is returning'.
Is it time to call all the sponsors of DISH and demand them to stop airing shows of Radical Islamic Hate and for this station to apologies to world Jewry and Zionism. The Muslim would riot if an Anti Muslim Program was on TV. In fact Obama made an entire ordeal over a YouTube Video of a Comedy about Mohammad. Now this is not a Comedy about Jewry This is a Hate Crime film.
On the reasons for the attack, Scottish historian
William Montgomery Watt notes the presence in Khaybar of the
Banu Nadir, who were inciting hostilities among with neighboring Arab tribes against the Islamic community in
Medina. Italian orientalist
Laura Veccia Vaglieri, while giving full credence to Watt's view, claims other motives might have included the prestige the engagement would confer upon Muhammad among his followers, as well the booty which could be used to supplement future campaigns.
[5][6]
The Jews of Khaybar finally surrendered and were allowed to live in the oasis on the condition that they would give one-half of their produce to the Muslims. Jews continued to live in the oasis for several more years until they were expelled by
caliph Umar. The imposition of tribute upon the conquered Jews served as a precedent for provisions in the
Islamic law requiring the exaction of tribute known as
jizya from
non-Muslims under Muslim rule, and confiscation of land belonging to non-Muslims into the collective property of the
Muslim community.
[5][7][8] In return, non-Muslim citizens were permitted to practice their faith, to enjoy a measure of communal autonomy, to be entitled to Muslim state's protection from outside aggression, and to be exempted from military service and the
Zakat, which is obligatory upon Muslim citizens.
In the 7th century, Khaybar was inhabited by Jews. The inhabitants had stored in a redoubt at Khaybar a siege-engine, swords, lances, shields and other weaponry. In the past some scholars attempted to explain the presence of the weapons, suggesting that they were used for settling quarrels among the families of the community. Vaglieri suggests that it is more logical to assume that the weapons were stored in a depôt for future sale. Similarly the Jews kept 20 bales of cloth and 500 cloaks for sale, and other luxury goods. These commercial activities as a cause of hostility, Vaglieri argues, are similar to the economic causes behind persecutions in many other countries throughout history.
[5]
The oasis was divided into three regions: al-Natat, al-Shikk, and al-Katiba, probably separated by natural divisions, such as the desert,
lava drifts, and swamps. Each of these regions contained several fortresses or redoubts including homes, storehouses and stables. Each fortress was occupied by a separate family and surrounded by cultivated fields and palm-groves. In order to improve their defensive capabilities, the fortresses were raised up on hills or
basalt rocks.
[5]
After they were sent into exile in 625, the
Banu Nadir had settled in Khaybar. In 627, the Nadir chief
Huyayy ibn Akhtab together with his son joined the Meccans and Bedouins besieging Medina during the
Battle of the Trench.
[9] In addition, the Nadir paid Arabian tribes to go to war against the Muslims. Bribing
Banu Ghatafan with half their harvest, Banu Nadir secured 2,000 men 300 horsemen from the tribe to attack Muhammad,
[10][11] and similarly persuaded the Bani Asad.
[12] They attempted to get the Banu Sulaym to attack the Muslims, but the tribe gave them only 700 men, since some of its leaders were sympathetic towards Islam; the Bani Amir refused to join them all together, as they had a pact with Muhammad.
[13] Once the battle started, Huyayy ibn Akhtab persuaded the
Banu Qurayza to go against their covenant with Muhammad and turn against him during the battle.
[14] After defeat of the confederates in the battle and Qurayza's subsequent surrender, Huyayy (who was at that time in the Qurayza strongholds of Medina) was killed alongside the men of the Qurayza. After the death of Huyayy,
Abu al-Rafi ibn Abi al-Huqayq took charge of the Banu Nadir at
Khaybar. Al-Huqayq soon approached neighboring tribes to raise an army against Muhammad.
[15][16] After learning this, the Muslims, aided by an Arab with a Jewish dialect, assassinated him.
[17]
Al-Huqayq was succeeded by
Usayr ibn Zarim. It has been recorded by one source
[18] that Usayr also approached the Ghatafan and rumors spread that he intended to attack the "capital of Muhammad". The latter sent Abdullah bin Rawaha with a number of his companions, among whom were
Abdullah bin Unays, an ally of Banu Salima, a clan hostile to the Jews. When they came to him they spoke to him and treated him saying that if he would come to Muhammad he would give him an appointment and honour him. They kept on at him until he went with them with a number of Jews. Abdullah bin Unays mounted him on his beast until when he was in al-Qarqara, about six miles from Khaybar, Usayr changed his mind about going with them. Abdullah perceived his intention as he was preparing to draw his sword so he rushed at him and struck him with his sword cutting off his leg. Usayr hit him with a stick of shauhat wood which he had in his hand and wounded his head. All Muhammad's emissaries fell upon the thirty Jewish companions and killed them except one man who escaped on his feet.
[19] Abdullah bin Unays is the assassin who volunteered and got permission to kill Banu Nadir's
Sallam ibn Abu al-Huqayq at a previous night mission in Khaybar.
Many scholars have considered the above machinations of the Nadir as a reason for the battle. According to
Montgomery Watt, their intriguing and use of their wealth to incite tribes against Muhammad left him no choice to attack;
[20]Vaglieri concurs that one reason for attack was that the Jews of Khaybar were responsible for the Confederates that attacked Muslims during the
Battle of the Trench.
[5] Shibli Numani also sees Khaybar's actions during the
Battle of the Trench, and draws particular attention to Banu Nadir's leader
Huyayy ibn Akhtab, who had gone to the
Banu Qurayza during the battle to instigate them to attack Muhammad.
[15]
In 628, when the Muslims attempted to perform the Umrah (lesser pilgrimage),
[21] After much negotiations, the Muslims entered a peace treaty with the Quraysh, ending the Muslim-Quraysh wars. Some of his followers, however, were discontent at the terms Muhammad had agreed to.
[22]
Scholars agree that Muhammad's need to raise his prestige amongst his followers, which had been eroded by the Treaty, was one reason for the battle.
[5][23][24][25] Vaglieri also argues that the conquest of Khaybar would satisfy those Muslims who had hoped to conquer Mecca, as well as bring in army and money.
[5] Stillman adds that Muhammad needed the victory to show the Bedouins, who were not strongly tied to the rest of the Muslim community, that the alliance with him would pay off.
[23] In addition, the treaty also gave Muhammad the assurance of not being attacked in the rear by the Meccans during the expedition.
[5]
As war with Muhammad seemed imminent, the Jews of Khaybar entered into an alliance with the Jews of
Fadak oasis. They also successfully persuaded the Bedouin Ghatafan tribe to join their side in the war in exchange for half their produce. However, in comparison to the power of the North, Muhammad's army did not seem to pose enough of a threat for the Khaybar to sufficiently prepare themselves for the upcoming battle. Along with the knowledge that Muhammad's army was small, and in need of resources, the lack of central authority at Khaybar prevented any unified defensive preparations, and quarrels between different families left the Jews disorganized.
[5] The Banu Fazara, related to the Ghatafan, also offered their assistance to Khaybar, after their unsuccessful negotiations with the Muslims.
[26]
During the battle, the Muslims were able to prevent Khaybar's Ghatafan allies (consisting of 4,000 men) from providing them with reinforcements. One reason given is that the Muslims were able to buy off the Bedouin allies of the Jews. Watt, however, also suggests that rumors of a Muslim attack on Ghatafan strongholds might also have played a role.
[23][27] According to Tabari, Muhammad's first stop in his conquest for Khaybar was in the valley of al-Raji, which was directly between the Ghatafan people and the Khaybar. In hearing the news of the Muslim army's position, the Ghatafan organized and rode out to honor their alliance with the Khaybar. After a day of travel, the Ghatafan thought they heard their enemy behind them and turned around in order to protect their families and possessions, thus opening the path for Muhammad's army.
[28] Another story says that a mysterious voice warned the Ghatafan of danger and convinced them to return to their homes.
[29]
The Muslims set out for Khaybar in May 628, Muharram 7 AH.
[30] According to different sources, the strength of Muslims army varied from 1,400 to 1,800 men and between 100 and 200 horses. Some Muslim women (including
Umm Salama) also joined the army, in order to take care of the wounded.
[31] Compared to the Khaybarian fighting strength of 10,000, the Muslim contingent was small, but this gave Muslims advantages. It allowed Muslims to swiftly and quietly march to Khaybar (in only three days
[32]), catching the city by surprise. It also made Khaybar overconfident in themselves.
[33] As a result, the Jews failed to mount a centrally organized defense, leaving each family to defend its own fortified redoubt.
[5][23] This underestimation of the Muslims allowed Muhammad to conquer each fortress one by one with relative ease, claiming food, weapons, and land as he went.
[34] One Muslim reported:"We met the workers of Khaybar coming out in the morning with their spades and baskets. When they saw the apostle and the army they cried, 'Muhammad with his force,' and turned tail and fled. The apostle said, 'Allah Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed. When we arrive in a people's square it is a bad morning for those who have been warned.'"
[35]
The Jews, after a rather bloody skirmish in front of one of the fortresses, avoided combat in the open country. Most of the fighting consisted of shooting arrows at a great distance. On at least one occasion the Muslims were able to storm the fortresses. The besieged Jews managed to organize, under the cover of darkness, the transfer of people and treasures from one fortress to another as needed to make their resistance more effective.
[5]
Neither the Jews nor the Muslims were prepared for an extended siege, and both suffered from a lack of provisions. The Jews, initially overconfident in their strength, failed to prepare even enough water supplies for a short siege.
[36] Early in the campaign, the Muslims' hunger caused them to slaughter and cook several asses which they had taken during their conquest. Muhammad, who had determined that the eating of horse, mule, and ass meat was forbidden, made the exception that one can eat forbidden foods so long as scarcity leaves no other option.
[29]
After the forts at an-Natat and those at ash-Shiqq were captured, there remained the last and the heavily guarded fortress called al-Qamus, the siege of which lasted between thirteen and nineteen days.
[34]
Several attempts by Muslims to capture this citadel in some single combat,
[37] failed. The first attempt was made by Abu Bakr, who took the banner of Muhammad and fought not well, and failed in the attempt to defeat his enemy. Umar, eager to prove himself took up Muhammad's banner and fought more vigorously than Bakr, but still failed. That night Muhammad proclaimed, "By God, tomorrow I shall give it, [the banner,] to a man who loves God and His Messenger, whom God and His Messenger love. Allah will bestow victory upon him."
[38] That morning, the Quraysh were bickering over who should have the honor to carry the banner, but Muhammad called out for Alī b. Abī Țālib.
[39] All this time
Ali, son-in-law and cousin of Muhammad, was ill and could not participate in the failed attempts. Alī came to Muhammad, who cured him of his opthatlmia, an inhibitive inflammation of the eyes, by applying his saliva in them. Ali, with new vigor, set out to meet the enemy, bearing the banner of Muhammad. When Ali reached the Citadel of Qamus, he was met at the gate by Marhab, a Jewish chieftain who was well experienced in battle. Marhab called out,
| “ | Khaybar knows well that I am Marhab
whose weapon is sharp, a warrior tested.
Sometimes I thrust with spear; sometimes I strike with sword,
when lions advance in burning rage. [40] | ” |
The two soldiers struck at each other, and after the second blow, Ali cleaved through Marhab's helmet, splitting his skull and landing his sword in his opponent's teeth.
[41] After his victory in single combat, the battle commenced, allowing Ali to move closer to taking the citadel. During the battle, Ali lost his shield. In need of a substitute, he picked up a door from the wall and used it to defend himself. When the time came to breach the fortress, he threw the door down as a bridge to allow his army to pass into the citadel and conquer the final threshold. The door was said to be so heavy that it took eight men to replace it on its hinges.
[29]"The Apostle revived their (his followers) faith by the example of
Ali, on whom he bestowed the surname of the Lion of God" (Asadullah)
[42]
The Jews speedily met with Muhammad to discuss the terms of surrender.
[37] The people of al-Waṭī and al-Sulālim surrendered to the Muslims on the condition that they be "treated leniently" and the Muslims refrain from shedding their blood. Muhammad agreed to these conditions and did not take any of the property of these two forts.
[43]
Muhammad met with Ibn Abi al-Huqaiq, al-Katibah and al-Watih
[44] to discuss the terms of surrender. As part of the agreement, the Jews of Khaybar were to evacuate the area, and surrender their wealth. The Muslims, would cease warfare, and not hurt any of the Jews. After the agreement some Jews approached Muhammad, with a request to continue to cultivate their fine orchards, and remain in the oasis. In return, they would give one-half of their produce to the Muslims.
[44] According to Ibn Hisham's version of the pact with Khaybar, it was concluded on the condition that the Muslims "may expel you [Jews of Khaybar] if and when we wish to expel you." Norman Stillman believes that this is probably a later interpolation intended to justify the expulsion of Jews in 642.
[43] The agreement with the Jews of Khaybar served as an important precedent for Islamic Law in determining the status of
dhimmis, (non-Muslims under Muslim rule).
[5][7][8]
After hearing about this battle, the people of
Fadak, allied with Khaybar during the battle, sent Muḥayyisa b. Masūd to Muhammad. Fadak offered to be "treated leniently" in return for surrender. A treaty similar to that of Khaybar was drawn with Fadak as well.
[43]
Among the Jewish women there was one who was forced to marry Muhammad after he killed her father , husband and brothers in front of her. It was
Safiyya bint Huyayy, daughter of the killed Banu Nadir chief Huyayy ibn Akhtab and widow of
Kenana ibn al-Rabi, the treasurer of Banu Nadir.
According to Ibn Ishaq, when Muhammad asked al-Rabi to locate the tribe's treasure, he denied knowing where it was breaking the surrender treaty. A Jew told Muhammad that he had seen Al-Rabi near a certain ruin every morning. When the ruin was excavated, it was found to contain some of the treasure. Muhammad ordered
Al-Zubayr to torture and interrogate al-Rabi until he revealed the location of the rest. Al-Zubayr drove a torch into Al-Rabi’s chest, but he still refused to surrender any knowledge of the whereabouts of the treasure, so he was then handed over to
Muhammad ibn Maslamah, whose brother had died in the battle, to be beheaded in revenge.
[43][46] Muslim biographers of Muhammad tell a story that a Jewish woman
Zeynab bint Al-Harith attempted to poison Muhammad to avenge her slain relatives. She poisoned a piece of lamb that she cooked for Muhammad and his companion, putting especially much poison into the shoulder; Muhammad's favorite part of lamb. The attempt on Muhammad's life failed because he reportedly spat out the meat, feeling that it was poisoned, while his companion ate the meat and died.
The victory in Khaybar greatly raised the status of Muhammad among his followers and local Bedouin tribes, who, seeing his power, swore allegiance to Muhammad and converted to
Islam. The captured booty and weapons strengthened his army, and he captured Mecca just 18 months after Khaybar.
[5][23]
According to mainstream Sunni opinion, the battle is mentioned in Sahih Bukhari, in which Muhammad is reported to have said "Tomorrow I will give the flag to a man with whose leadership Allah will grant (the Muslim) victory." Afterwards, he gave the flag to Ali.
[47] According to a Shia tradition, Muhammad called for
Ali, who killed a Jewish chieftain with a sword-stroke, which split in two the helmet, the head and the body of the victim. Having lost his shield, Ali is said to have lifted both of the doors of the fortress from its hinges, climbed into the moat and held them up to make a bridge whereby the attackers gained access to the redoubt. The door was so heavy that forty men were required to put it back in place. This story is the basis for the Shia view of Ali as the prototype of heroes.
[5][48]
On one occasion, Muslim soldiers, without Muhammad's opinion and permission, killed and cooked a score of donkeys, which had escaped from a farm. The incident led Muhammad to forbid to Muslims the meat of horses, mules, and donkeys, unless consumption was forced by necessity. The Jews surrendered when, after a month and a half of the siege, all but two fortresses were captured by the Muslims.
[5]
Muslim Scholars suggest that capturing Khaibar had been a Divine promise implied in the Quran verse below:
| “ | "Allâh has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this." [Quran 48:20] | ” |
The event is mentioned in many Sunni Hadith collections. The Muslim scholar Saifur Rahman al Mubarakpuri mentions that the hadith below regarding Amir's accidental suicide is related to Khaibar:
It has been reported on the authority of Salama b. Akwa' who said: On the day of the Battle of Khaibar my brother fought a fierce fight by the side of the Messenger of Allah. His sword rebounded and killed him. The Companions of the Messenger of Allah talked about his death and doubted (whether it was martyrdom). (They said): (He is) a man killed by his own weapon, and expressed doubt about his affair. Salama said: When the Messenger of Allah returned from Khaibar, I said: Messenger of Allah, permit me that I may recite to you some rajaz verses. The Messenger of Allah permitted him. 'Umar b. Khattab said: I know what you will recite. I recited:
By God, if God had guided us not,
We would hive neither been guided aright nor practised charity,
Nor offered prayers.
The Messenger of Allah said: What you have said is true, 'I (continued):
And descend on us peace and tranquillity
And keep us steadfast if we encounter (with our enemies)
And the polytheists have rebelled against us.
When I finished my rajaz, the Messenger of Allah said: Who composed these verses? I said: They were composed by my brother. The Messenger of Allah said: May God show mercy to him! I said: By God, some people are reluctant to invoke God's mercy on him (because) they say he is a man who died by his own sword. (Hearing this) the Messenger of Allah said: He died as God's devotee and warrior. Ibn Shihab has said: I asked one of the sons of Salama (b. Akwa') about (the death of 'Amir). He related to me a similar tradition except that he said: When I said some people were reluctant invoke God's blessings on him, the Messenger of Allah said: They lied. ('Amir) died as God's devotee and warrior (in the cause of Allah). For him there is a double reward, and he pointed out this by putting his two fingers together.
Sahih Muslim,
19:4450[49][50]
Allah's Apostle offered the Fajr prayer when it was still dark, then he rode and said, 'Allah Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. When we approach near to a nation, the most unfortunate is the morning of those who have been warned." The people came out into the streets saying, "Muhammad and his army." Allah's Apostle vanquished them by force and their warriors were killed; the children and women were taken as captives. Safiya was taken by Dihya Al-Kalbi and later she belonged to Allah's Apostle go who married her and her Mahr was her manumission.
Sahih al-Bukhari,
2:14:68
reference below the article
 |
A
major TV platform is now being used to spread vile, Islamist Jew hatred
throughout America.
Pamela
Geller has the story on her blog:
Published:
July 22nd, 2013
 The
image of the Jew in the Ramadan TV show "Khaybar" are treacherous, hateful of
the other, scheming, and corrupt. Photo Credit: Screen
shot
Back on July 9, I reported on a vicious new mini-series airing in
the Muslim world that dramatizes and glorifies Muhammad's annihilation of an
entire tribe, the Jews at the Khaiber (or Khaybar) oasis in Arabia. Many Atlas
readers are familiar with the Muslim death chant that we hear at mass
anti-Jewish rallies, anti-Israel demos, on the jihad flotilla, etc.: "Khaybar
Khaybar ya yahud, Jaish Muhammad sa ya'ud." This means "Khaybar, Khaybar, O
Jews, the army of Mohammed is returning." This death chant refers to the mass
slaughter at Khaybar of Jews by Muhammad and his soldiers of allah, and says
that it is going to happen again. And remember, in Islam, Muhammad is the
supreme example to be imitated by Muslims.
Thanks to DISH TV, this jihad
porn is being aired in the US. Voice your disgust and opposition (politely) to
DISH. Call 1-800-894-9131. The customer service number: 800-333-3474.
To talk to a human, press 1, then 2, or this 877-347-4778.
DISH
Headquarters phone number is 303-723-1000.
Charles W.
Ergen, Chairman of the Board
Joseph P. Clayton,
Director, President and CEO
James DeFranco, Director and
Executive Vice President, Sales & Distribution
Candy
Ergen, Director
Steven R. Goodbarn,
Director
Gary S. Howard, Director
David K.
Moskowitz, Senior Advisor and Director
Tom A.
Ortolf, Director
Carl E. Vogel, Senior Advisor and
Director
I called and spoke with Carmel Jackson, Executive Resolution
Center. DISH told me to take my complaint to the Dubai network. I said Dubia can
do what they want. It is you who is bringing this genocidal propganda to the
American people. It is you who are responsible. And Ms. Jackson gave me a
disconnected number in the event that I wanted to reach her. (303 942 8675)They trade on the NASDAQ:DISH $45.73.
Sell the stock. Urge family members to do so. And keep trying
-- here is my online session with them:Please wait for a site operator
to respond.
You are now chatting with 'Ryan'
Ryan: Good afternoon
Pamela.
Ryan: Welcome to USDish.com. I am here to help you set up new
services and answer any questions you might have.
Ryan: What brings you
to chat today?
Pamela: Hey Ryan, how can I complain about deeply
offensive programming. Programming that incites genocide. Is there a form or a
number?
Pamela: How is it reported?
Ryan: You'll probably want to
speak to the actual station itself...
Pamela: But DISH is carrying that
station -- the station is in Dubai --DISH is bringing it to the American people
- to whom do I address my concerns at DISH
Ryan:
1-800-894-9131
Pamela: Thank you. And is there an online
form?
Ryan: I don't know, you have reached a retailer, Pamela, not Dish
directly. It's not my job, nor Dish's, to censor stations.
Ryan: Have a
good day.
Chat session has ended.
Dish Network Carries One Of Arab Channels
Airing Antisemitic Ramadan Drama Series 'Khaybar' MEMRI, July 19, 2013
During the month of Ramadan, Arab television channels
customarily air drama and comedy television specials after the breaking of the
fast every evening. A drama series airing this Ramadan is titled "Khaybar,"
which is the name of the Jewish community in the Arabian Peninsula conquered by
the Prophet Muhammad in 628 CE. The series depicts the producers' view of
relations between Muslims and the Arab tribes of Medina, as well as with the
Jews of Medina and Khaybar, leading up to the Jews' expulsion from the latter.
According to Muslim tradition, in 628 CE, Muhammad
expelled the two Jewish tribes of Medina – Banu Qaynuqa and Banu Nadir – from
the city. Another Jewish tribe, Banu Qurayza, was completely destroyed – all its
men were executed and the women, children, and property were distributed as
booty among the Muslims. Muhammad also defeated the Jews of Khaybar (including
the Jews of Banu Nadir, who settled there after their expulsion from Medina),
but allowed them to stay there and continue working their lands on the condition
that they give half of their crop yields to the Muslims of Medina. During the
time of the second Muslim Caliph, 'Omar ibn Al-Khattab, the Jews were expelled
from Khaybar and their lands were divided among the
Muslims.
Thus, it should also be noted that the term
"Khaybar" is also a symbol of the Jews' ultimate defeat by the Muslims; chants
of "Khaybar, Khaybar, oh Jews, the army of Muhammad shall return" are commonly
heard at Islamist and jihadi gatherings.
The "Khaybar"
Series
According to Arab media reports in early 2013, the show
"focuses on the social, economic, and religious lives of the Jews, including
their politics, their plots, and the way they managed and controlled the [Aws
and Khazraj Arab] tribes." It was also reported that the show portrays "the
[Jews'] hostility and hatred towards others, along with their treacherous
nature, their repeated betrayals, and their despicable racism."
As MEMRI
noted on July 10, 2013 in Inquiry and Analysis No. 995, The
Image Of The Jew In The Ramadan TV Show 'Khaybar' – Treacherous, Hateful Of The
Other, Scheming, And Corrupt, it was reported that the series would air on
Dubai TV, Dream TV (Egypt), Al-Iraqiyya TV (Iraq), Algerian Channel 3, Atlas TV
(Algeria), Qatar TV, and UAE TV, and other channels. However, it is currently
airing on Dubai TV, Dream 3 TV (Egypt), and three Algerian channels: Channel 3,
Atlas, and the Algerian Koran channel.
MEMRI has been following the
filming, production, and airing of this series since March 2013; see, in
addition to the abovementioned report, also MEMRI Special Dispatch No.5351, New
Arab Antisemitic TV Series: Jews Of Khaybar Instigate War Between Arab
Tribes, July 3, 2013; and MEMRI TV Clip No. 3902, Actors
in Arab TV Series Khaybar Make Antisemitic Remarks, March 14 May13,
2013.
The MEMRI report The
Image Of The Jew In The Ramadan TV Show 'Khaybar' – Treacherous, Hateful Of The
Other, Scheming, And Corrupt also notes that Arab and especially Egyptian
media coverage of the show's filming and production have been tinged with
antisemitism; for example, the Egyptian daily Al-Fajr's June 20, 2013 report on
the wrapping up of filming was titled "The Treachery Of The Jews Ends Next
Sunday." Director Muhammad Aziziya stated that the series "sheds light on the
nature of the Jews... exposes their hatred of Islam and the vindictive nature
that has ruled them throughout history" and added that "neither Egyptians nor
Arabs need this show to justify their hatred of Zionism." Screenwriter Yusri
Al-Gindi said, "The Jews... still act according to their nature, despite the
passing generations; they corrupt any society in which they live, and therefore
no regime can protect them with any contract or agreement." He continued, "The
crisis in the Arab world offers the best proof of this, and this is where the
show gets its current relevance."
In MEMRI TV Clip No. 3902, Actors
in Arab TV Series Khaybar Make Antisemitic Remarks, March 14, 2013,
actor Mustafa Hashish said, "I play one of the most prominent Jews, who hatches
plots and schemes. He is, of course, very miserly – the purely typical Jew... So
this gives you an idea what the Jews are made of." Actor Ahmad 'Abd Al-Halim
said, "I play one of the Jewish characters, who demonstrates the behavior of the
Jewish human being. All he thinks about is accumulating money." Actor Ahmad
Maher said, "History has shown that the Jews are a people with no moral values,
who do not honor their agreements." |
 The Internal Revenue
Service recognizes Americans for Peace and Tolerance as a 501c3 non-profit
corporation. If you would like to donate to our cause, you may send a check to
APT,
15 Main St. Suite 118, Watertown, MA 02472 or donate
online. |
|
- 1^ a b http://www.islamstory.com/غزوة-خيبر-1-2
- 2^ a b Lings (1983), p. 264
- 3^ Lings (1983), p. 255-6
- 4^ "Ali". Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
- 5^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Veccia Vaglieri, L. "Khaybar", Encyclopaedia of Islam
- 6^ Stillman 19
- 7^ a b Stillman 18–19
- 8^ a b Lewis 10
- 9^ Stillman 14, 16-17
- 10^ Watt, Muhammad at Medina, p. 34-37.
- 11^ Nomani, Sirat al-Nabi, p. 368-370.
- 12^ al-Halabi, Sirat-i-Halbiyyah (Vol. II, part 12), p. 19.
- 13^ Lings, Muhammad: his life based on the earliest sources, p. 215-6.
- 14^ Peterson, Muhammad: the prophet of God, p. 127.
- 15^ a b Nomani (1979), vol. II, pg. 156
- 16^ Urwa, Fath al-Bari, Vol. VII, pg. 363
- 17^ Stillman 17
- 18^ Zurqani, Ala al-Mawahib, Vol. II, p.196, Egypt
- 19^ Ibn Ishaq, A. Guillaume, p. 665-666
- 20^ Watt 189
- 21^ Lings (1987), p. 249
- 22^ Ehlert, Trude."Muhammad", Encyclopaedia of Islam
- 23^ a b c d e Stillman 18
- 24^ Watt 188–189
- 25^ Lewis Arabs in History 43
- 26^ Nomani (1979), vol. II, pg. 159
- 27^ Watt (1956), pg. 93
- 28^ al-Tabari (1997). The History of al-Tabari: The Victory of Islam. Albany : State University Of New York. p. 116.
- 29^ a b c P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs, Editors. "Khaybar". Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill Online. Retrieved April 18, 2012.
- 30^ Watt 1956, pg. 341
- 31^ Nomani (1979), vol. II, pg. 162
- 32^ Haykal, Muhammad Husayn. Ch. "The Campaign of Khaybar and Missions to Kings". The Life of Muhammad. Shorouk International, 1983.
- 33^ Lings (1983), pg. 263
- 34^ a b al-Tabari (1997). The History of al-Tabari: The Victory of Islam. Albany : State University Of New York. p. 117.
- 35^ Spencer, Robert (14). "'Khaybar, Khaybar, O Jews.'". Human Events 62(27): p12–12.
- 36^ Watt (1956), pg. 219
- 37^ a b Watt (1956), pg. 218
- 38^ "Sahih Bukhari". Retrieved 24 May 2013.
- 39^ al-Tabari (1997). The History of al-Tabari: The Victory of Islam. Albany : State University Of New York. pp. 119–121.
- 40^ al-Tabari (1997). The History of al-Tabari: The Victory of Islam. Albany : State University Of New York. p. 120.
- 41^ al-Tabari (1997). The History of al-Tabari: The Victory of Islam. Albany : State University Of New York. p. 121.
- 42^ Gibbon, D&F of Roman Empire Vol V. page 365
- 43^ a b c d Ibn Hisham. Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya (The Life of Muhammad). English translation in Guillame (1955), pp. 145–146
- 44^ a b Watt 1956), pg. 218
- 45^ al-Tabari (1997). The History of al-Tabari: The Victory of Islam. Albany : State University Of New York. p. 122.
- 46^ Ibn Hisham.Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya (The Life of Muhammad). English translation in Stillman (1979), pp. 145–146
- 47^ Companions of Muhammad Bukhari :: Book 5 :: Volume 57 :: Hadith 51
- 48^ Jafri_
- 49^ a b The Conquest of Khaibar, Witness-Pioneer.com
- 50^ a b The Sealed Nectar, by Saifur Rahman al Mubarakpuri, pg 433
