Showing posts with label ERIC HOLDER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ERIC HOLDER. Show all posts

Monday, February 19, 2018

Gun Control and Parkland Florida





It takes me a while to digest what has happened in Parkland Florida. I have many friends who live there and their Grand- children went to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. I know Parkland since that was one of the great Cities I was going to settle in with my husband But we settled in Royal Palm Beach and after Jordan died I moved to Wellington. It was a shock to me that a Man not a child can walk in with a assault riffle he bought when he was under age and kill people This was premeditated, planned out hate. This has nothing to do with gun control since their are gun laws banning guns in New York City and yet there are criminals who buy guns on the Black Market. There are guns still out there that Obama, Clinton and Holder through out during the Fast and Furious and never recovered. That our own government supplied the Black Market and Terrorists. Guns did not hold themselves and press the trigger, people do. 

Children get killed by drunk drivers, by kitchen knives, by parents beating them to death, by strangers kidnapping them and torturing them. But that is never mentioned because some of our representatives want to take away your self defense just like the Nazis in did in Germany. Many Jews and Christians were forced to give up their guns by law and the Germans Nazis hauled them off to concentration camps.
This does not stop terrorist from killing our children in schools. They can plant a bomb in the school yard. There is no law against pressure cookers when one exploded in Boston. No one has presented a law that states if you purchase a pressure cooker you have to register it or when you buy knives. Many people who live in Europe and in Africa who have been stabbed to death, I don't see Our Congress screaming about that. Or dump trucks which stood on the rail tracks and cause trains to crash and derail No one screams about that.


I went down to my old home in South Florida. I went to several funerals. I went to homes where they sat Shiva and I cried for those who are injured and prayed for those who died. But we can not bring them back. We need to remember them and not forget what has just happened.


This was a hate crime. This is a declaration of War on We The People. Our Liberal Communists who want to enslave us by taking away our defense and as soon as our defense is removed we become helpless like those who were ushered, pulled out of their homes by their hair and the world sat there helpless and watched genocide. All your congresspeople who are screaming gun control all carry concealed weapons. Let them be the first to give up theirs.

Saturday, July 19, 2014

Holder's DoJ honors Al Qaeda fundraiser,

Holder's DoJ honors Al Qaeda fundraiser, director of Pakistani spy front group, Khalid Qazi, with top award

Friday, December 13, 2013

Enlist in the war against government police state!




Enlist in the war against government police state!
 
By Larry Klayman
Freedom Watch
December 13, 2013
 
With each new week, the American people learn more about the government’s spying on over 300 million citizens – with the obvious intent and effect of coercing and enslaving all of us to its collective will – particularly those who challenge the duplicity, deceit, policies, and corrupt, treasonous and seditious actions of establishment “leaders” like President Barack Hussein Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Speaker John Boehner and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. Here is what we have learned, thanks in large part to the “leaks” of whistleblower Edward Snowden, National Security Agency (“NSA”) Inspector General findings and those few segments of the media still willing to investigate and report on this largest and most heinous violation of constitutional rights in American history.
 
First we have learned that the NSA, the lackey of the Washington D.C. establishment, has for years obtained the intrusive metadata from cell phone calls and records of the entire American citizenry, without regard, as required by the Patriot Act and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, to whether there is any connection to terrorists or terrorism overseas. In addition, the NSA has also accessed and has in its possession the email, Internet and social media contacts and records of all of us. To try to stop this, I have filed two class action lawsuits against the NSA and its enablers, such as the Obama Justice Department and its Attorney General Eric Holder – both of which work with the NSA to spy on Americans under the authority of President Obama. Thus, Obama was named as a defendant as well. To view copies of these complaints and recent court pleadings seeking preliminary injunctions to stop this illegal and unconstitutional criminal conduct which, after a recent hearing on November 18, the federal court in the District of Columbia is now considering whether to issue, go to www.freedomwatchusa.org.
 
With regard to the metadata obtained from cell phone use, here is what our expert Edward Felten, Professor of Computer Science at Princeton University, in these cases has to say in sworn testimony about its dangers and use by the NSA potentially and in concrete instances against all of us:
 
“The structured nature of metadata makes it very easy to analyze massive datasets using sophisticated data-mining and link-analysis programs. That analysis is greatly facilitated by technological advances in computing, electronic data storage, and digital data mining. These advances have radically increased the ability to collect, store, and analyze personal communications, including metadata . . . Sophisticated computing tools permit the analysis of large datasets to identify embedded patterns and relationships, including personal details, habits, and behaviors. As a result, individual pieces of data that previously carried less potential to expose private information may now, in the aggregate, reveal sensitive details about people’s everyday lives – details that people had no intent or expectation of sharing.”
 
Thus, in practice, the NSA has the ability to know our most intimate, personal and professional details; your communications with lawyers, accountants, doctors, girlfriends, boyfriends, wives, husbands and paramours and provide this information to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other government agencies that are being used as tools by the establishment to destroy us. Indeed, under public pressure, it has now been admitted by the NSA’s Inspector General – the semi-independent internal watchdog of the agency – that NSA employees have been using its super spy capabilities to violate the privacy of their so-called loved ones. If such crimes are occurring at this relatively low level, then imagine the as yet not fully disclosed actions of high officials, who play a deadly game to remain in power to enrich themselves at the public trough or in the case of Obama, transform our nation from a capitalist and free state to a socialist Marxist one, generally loyal not to ordinary Americans but to his wildly ultra-leftist, atheist, anti-Judeo-Christian, anti-white and Muslim benefactors, supporters and friends – of which he is their “Manchurian Candidate.”  Among Obama’s supporters and political hit men, notwithstanding the ultra rich and powerful likes of George Soros, who along with his Jewish father sold fellow Jews out to Adolf Hitler during World War II to save their own slimy necks, are the atheist and communist sympathizing groups such as People For the American Way – which Soros supports and contributes to – (and its vile publication Right Wing Watch), Center for American Progress created by George Soros, Hillary Clinton and previously run by former Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta, and its comrade in arms the Southern Poverty Law Center (and its hateful publication Hatewatch), also supported by Soros, who run interference for and do much of the dirty work for the socialist “Mullah in Chief.” Soros and these groups foam at their depraved mouths in carrying out their efforts to destroy conservatives, libertarians, people of faith and anyone else who believes in true freedom. Were the intimate details of your life to be fed by Obama and his henchmen to groups such as these, the reputations and lives of anyone seeking to take on the government, which to them is their god, would surely be destroyed as well.
 
Recently, sure enough it has also been revealed that the NSA and its sister spy agency, the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), have been eavesdropping on pornographic and other intimate internet sites to blackmail and destroy American citizens that get in the establishment’s way or could be labeled subversive under their convenient definition. While I am hardly an advocate or user of pornographic sites, there are “bad guys” tied to terrorism and other high crimes who would deserve this treatment and ultimate indictment and conviction, the reality is that it has also been revealed that people having no such connection and committing no such crimes have been surveyed.
 
This criminal government conduct and its chilling effect on the First Amendment free speech and associational rights of all Americans cannot be tolerated. If the courts do not step in to stop this massive violation of constitutional rights and then seriously monitor the offending government agencies to make sure that the nation’s spy apparatus is used for the purposes for which it is intended – to legitimately protect our national security – then this is cause enough to wage revolution, using all legal and God given means – to end this evil subjugation.
 
The Founding Fathers would have done no less, and did no less when faced with far less treachery. Now is the time for all of us to stand up, risking our lives if necessary, to restore the freedoms they won for all Americans. If we do not act, then we will be enslaved to the god of a corrupt government, run by despotic establishment tyrants and hacks such as Obama, Reid, McConnell, Boehner and Pelosi, who will use the NSA, FBI, CIA and other agencies to further their own selfish and destructive agendas – in effect waging war on the American people to keep us down and out.
 
Let us not wait a minute longer for them to employ these illegal spy powers on a massive scale to destroy us by instead now taking the war to them – in the names of Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, Adams, Madison, Patrick Henry and other valiant heroes in our nation’s proud history.
 

For more information, contact daj142182@gmail.com or (424) 274-2579.  See also www.reclaimamericanow.net

Monday, November 4, 2013

Judge warns Obama Justice Department and NSA not to delay class actions over PRISM and orders hearing for November 18th

 
Judge warns Obama Justice Department and NSA not to delay class actions over PRISM and orders hearing for November 18th
 
Calls Cases at the Pinnacle of Public National Interest
 
 
Hearing: D.C. Federal Courthouse, 3rd and Constitution Ave., N.W.,
11:30 A.M. (Courtroom 18)
 
 
(Washington, D.C., November 4, 2013).  Late last week, after Larry Klayman and other plaintiffs filed motions for preliminary injunction against the NSA and other government and corporate defendants in his class action suits (13-cv-881, 13-cv-851) concerning the agency’s growing spy scandal, the Honorable Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the Obama Justice Department’s request to delay the proceedings and ordered the NSA to respond to the motions by November 11, with plaintiffs being accorded an opportunity to reply on November 14. Importantly, Judge Leon set a hearing date of November 18 to hear oral argument and possibly rule on the motions to order the cessation of the NSA’s PRISM program, which has accessed and unconstitutionally violated the private communications of over 300 million Americans.
 
In issuing his rulings, Judge Leon warned the Obama Justice Department and its NSA client that he expects this case to move forward quickly given its national importance. He warned the government’s legal team not to seek delay, admonishing it that “we work 24/7 around this courthouse. I don’t want to hear anything about vacations, weddings, days off. Forget about it. This is a case at the pinnacle of public national interest, pinnacle. All hands 24/7. No excuses. You got a team of lawyers. Mr. Klayman is alone apparently. You have litigated cases in this courthouse when it is matters of this consequence and enormity. You know how this Court operates.” See www.freedomwatchusa.org for transcript of Oct. 31.
 
Klayman stated: “We are heartened by the judge’s admonitions to the Obama Justice Department lawyers. Never before in American history have the people been subjected to such egregious violations of their constitutional rights, designed to coerce them into submission, as our so-called government leaders continue to take down the nation with their indifference to the people’s grievances and their tyrannical rule. These class action lawsuits are intended to have the courts order an end to this administration’s tyranny.”
 
The hearing of November 18th will occur ironically just one day before the Reclaim America Now Coalition in Washington, D.C. See www.reclaimamericanow.net
 

Contact daj1421282@gmail.com or (424) 274-2579.  

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Judge Slaps Down Eric Holder's Request For Fast and Furious Lawsuit to be Dismissed

Judge Slaps Down Eric Holder's Request For Fast and Furious Lawsuit to be Dismissed





Katie Pavlich | Oct 01, 2013
Late Monday night, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson denied a Department of Justice request todismiss a lawsuit filed by the House Oversight Committee last summer over Operation Fast and Furious documents.
“In the Court's view endorsing the proposition that the executive may assert an unreviewable right to withhold materials from the legislature would offend the Constitution more than undertaking to resolve the specific dispute that has been presented here,” Jackson wrote in her ruling. "Neither legal nor prudential considerations support the dismissal of this action, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action will be denied."
The lawsuit was filed shortly after Attorney General Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over requested Fast and Furious documents to Congress and after President Obama asserted executive privilege over documents despite denying any involvement in the operation.
"This ruling is a repudiation of the Obama Justice Department and Congressional Democrats who argued the courts should have no role in the dispute over President 
Eric Holder Tells Kansas Governor New State Gun Law IsObama's improper assertion of executive privilege to protect an attempted Justice Department cover-up of Operation Fast and Furious,” Chairman of the House Oversight Committee Darrell Issa said in a statement. “I remain confident in the merits of the House's decision to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt; this ruling is an important step toward the transparency and accountability the Obama Administration has refused to provide."
Senator Chuck Grassley, who has been investigating Operation Fast and Furious since early 2011, also released a statement.
“This is an important step toward ensuring that Congress’ constitutional responsibility to provide oversight of the executive branch is vindicated. The President’s sweeping assertion of executive privilege over Fast and Furious documents is completely contrary to the transparent government that he promised and beyond any valid claim of privilege under the law," Grassley said. "The documents subpoenaed by the House of Representatives are essential to gaining a full understanding of the gunwalking program that led to the tragic death of a U.S. Border Patrol agent and the efforts to keep the truth about it from Congress and the American people. Given that its refusal to comply with the subpoena is unlikely to survive legal scrutiny, I fully expect the Obama administration to continue to put up procedural roadblocks to resolving this dispute. However, I look forward to the court finally deciding the case on the merits.”
At this point, there has not been a ruling from Jackson about whether Obama's executive privilege will stand. A ruling on whether executive privilege applies to the Fast and Furious documents in question is expected within the next two weeks. 


Justice Department seeks dismissal of Fast and Furious


Blog Archive » INSIDE PITCH — Eric Holder is an attorney general
The Justice Department on Monday night sought dismissal of a lawsuit by a Republican-led House of Representatives committee demanding that Attorney General Eric Holder produce records about the botched law enforcement probe of gun-trafficking called Operation Fast and Furious.
President Barack Obama has invoked executive privilege and the attorney general has been found to be in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over documents that might explain what led the Justice Department to reverse course after initially denying that federal agents had used a controversial tactic called gun-walking in the failed law enforcement operation. The tactic resulted in hundreds of illegally acquired weapons purchased at Arizona gun shops winding up in Mexico, where many of them were recovered from crime scenes. Two guns in Operation Fast and Furious were found on the U.S. side of the border at the scene of a shooting in which U.S. border agent Brian Terry was killed. In a Feb. 4, 2011, letter to Congress, the Justice Department said that agents made every effort to interdict weapons that have been purchased illegally and prevent their transportation to Mexico, which turned out to be incorrect. Ten months later, the department withdrew the letter.
In its court papers, the Justice Department says the Constitution does not permit the courts to resolve the political dispute between the executive branch and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that is seeking the records. The political branches have a long history of resolving disputes over congressional requests without judicial intervention, the court filing said.
If the lawsuit is allowed to go forward, "countless other suits by Congress are sure to follow, given the volume of document requests issued by the dozens of congressional committees that perform oversight functions," the Justice Department's court filing stated. "This case thus illustrates vividly why the judiciary must defer to the time-tested political process for resolution of such disputes."
In the current dispute over records from Operation Fast and Furious, the House asked the court to reject a claim by the president asserting executive privilege, a legal position designed to protect certain internal administration communications from disclosure.
The failure of Holder and House Republicans to work out a deal on the documents led to votes in June that held the attorney general in civil and criminal contempt of Congress.
In Fast and Furious, federal agents abandoned the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agency's usual practice of intercepting all weapons they believed to be illicitly purchased, often as soon as they were taken out of gun shops. Instead, the goal of the tactic known as "gun-walking" was to track such weapons to high-level arms traffickers, who had long eluded prosecution, and to dismantle their networks. Federal agents lost track of many of the guns. The operation identified more than 2,000 illicitly purchased weapons, and some 1,400 of them have yet to be recovered.



http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/dcd/ajackson
Slide 1: click for next

District Judge, Amy Berman Jackson
Photo: Taisie Berkeley

Chambers: (202) 354-3460

Courtroom Deputy: John Haley (202) 354-3133
Amy Berman Jackson was appointed as a United States District Judge in March of 2011. Prior to joining the Court, she was engaged in private practice in Washington, D.C. as a member of Trout Cacheris, where she specialized in complex criminal and civil trials and appeals. Earlier, she was a partner at Venable, Baetjer, Howard, and Civiletti. She began her career as a law clerk for the Hon. Harrison L. Winter on the United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, and she served as an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, where she received Department of Justice Special Achievement Awards for her work on murder and sexual assault cases.

Judge Jackson received her J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School and her A.B. cum laude from Harvard College.

Click Here to visit Judge Jackson's Court Webpage (including internship and clerkship information).

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Stand your ground and Eric Holder.

Stand your ground is a law made so if someone wants to do you harm whether if its with a gun, knife, fists or car you have the right to protect yourself, your family, your home, and your property. This is plain and simple. You have people like Obama who want to disarm you. This is going into the back door to remove your 2nd Amendment rights. Take away the reason to own a gun and the gun is gone. How many times have you called the police and they never showed up? I know when I lived in Philadelphia, a zillion times the police didn't show. So I used the stand-your-grounds to detain a criminal. The criminal was armed with a gun and I unarmed him. with one shot to the hand. The criminal had the nerve to try and sue me for shooting him on my own property. Now I was protecting my son who was 9 years old, my home and my property. Stand-your-ground was again used by me when Animal Activists grabbed my son and tried to throw him into a car to kidnap him. I had a permit to carry at that time. I used my gun to blow the kneecaps off the kidnapper. Again they tried to sue me for the use of a gun. 

The only people who don't want guns are certain victims who were taught if guns are not available the criminal can't get one. But that is not true. There is a black market and they don't check your ID or age. They don't care if the gun was stolen or it was smuggled in. They don't care why the person need the guns. Then again criminals are criminals because they don't follow the law. If they followed the law, they wouldn't be criminals.

We had a person like Rachel Jeantel who sat on the stand and lied to Piers Morgan that the word Cracka is not a racial slur but it is. In the Urban Dictionary is demonstrates how this word is equal to the N word. If you call a Black person the N word you are charged with racial discrimination, but if a Black person calls you the C word that is ok they dont know better. And that is a bunch of Bull.

Rachel admitted that Martin used drugs. She said Marijuana. I have MS and they treat pain with legal prescription Marijuana and regardless of how many doctors notes or scientific studies Marijuana is illegal in the state of Florida and very expensive. Where did Trayvon Martin get the money to buy Marijuana and how much was he smoking? 

Kids break into peoples houses for a lesser crime. They have an addiction to shopping. On TV they say you need to collect them all like the Pokemon. I have seen children walk into Walmart and shoplift Pokemon cards, toys, and games because they have to catch them all. But I don't see Eric Holder who is so interested in our youth stop these Commercials on the Kids Channels. When Pokemon first came out, kids were robbing other kids and stores for these card, games, and even videos as well as stealing money from their parents to buy these items off of other kids who had stolen these items.

We are having riots in Oakland Ca with the shops closed and the gates down and these are young adults, teens, and little children who are thieves in training who are breaking through the security gates and stealing TV's, computers, and anything that is not nailed down. What these shop owners should do is open elsewhere and leave Oakland Ca like the merchants did in Philadelphia during the race riots of the 60's on Ridge Avenue. Why rebuild? You need terrorism insurance which is very expensive to stay open there. These rioters are terrorists! Holder and Obama should treat them as such. If they would want to rise above the ghettos then they should go back to school and learn to read and write, speak proper English, and not slang that makes them sound as if they are in a gang. When you go out in the real world you speak properly.

I am also angry that I, my late husband, and my son had to take SAT's and had a certain score to even be considered for college. On the Piers Morgan show this Jeantel was given a full paid scholarship to a Black College. Why? Jeantel admitted in court that she can't read script writing, that she had her friend write the letter to Trayvons parents, and that when she was asked to read the transcript of the deposition it took her 5 minutes of a struggle to read type. Then she admitted she "can't read type too well SIR!" I learned script in 2nd grade, Where was she during 2nd, 3rd, 4th etc. This no child left behind did an injustice to the children of her generation. Maybe she should have been left behind. How is she suppose to survive college when the teachers and the professors write in script and mathematical formulas are written on the boards. It's a waste of money to give her when there are far better black, tan, purple, orange, or green students whose parents work 3 jobs just to make ends meet so they can have a better life than what Jeantel made and chose for herself. She doesn't have a High School diploma not because she didn't have the opportunity, it was because she didn't want one. She dropped out. But she knows how to "up-do her hair" she knows how to cash her welfare check, she knows how to use her food stamps. and she knows how to use the system to make people feel sorry for her. She has an overbite. Millions of people have overbites and her Medicaid Insurance that Florida providers will take care of her overbite. That is her excuse. Also in Florida if you test for using drugs or admit to using drugs your food stamps your welfare is removed. With her testimony and they way she spook about Trayvon she sounded romantically involved.  I wouldn't be surprised if Trayvon fathered children with Jeantel. What does she do for a living that she can afford an iPhone, and sit on the phone all day talking to Trayvon?

Many states have some form of stand-your-ground law. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts (though the term is used very loosely here), Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana,New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas,Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming have adopted Castle Doctrine statutes, and other states Iowa,Virginia, and Washington) have considered stand-your-ground laws of their own.


In the United Statesstand-your-ground law states that a person may justifiably use force in self-defense when there is reasonable belief of an unlawful threat, without an obligation to retreat first. The concept sometimes exists in statutory law and sometimes through common law precedents. One key distinction is whether the concept only applies to defending a home or vehicle, or whether it applies to all lawfully occupied locations. Under these legal concepts, a person is justified in using deadly force in certain situations and the "stand your ground" law would be a defense or immunity to criminal charges and civil suit. The difference between immunity and a defense is that an immunity bars suit, charges, detention and arrest. A defense, such as an affirmative defense, permits a plaintiff or the state to seek civil damages or a criminal conviction but may offer mitigating circumstances that justify the accused's conduct.
More than half of the states in the United States have adopted the Castle doctrine, stating that a person has no duty to retreat when their home is attacked. Some states go a step further, removing the duty of retreat from other locations. "Stand Your Ground", "Line in the Sand" or "No Duty to Retreat" laws thus state that a person has no duty or other requirement to abandon a place in which he has a right to be, or to give up ground to an assailant. Under such laws, there is no duty to retreat from anywhere the defender may legally be.Other restrictions may still exist; such as when in public, a person must be carryingfirearms in a legal manner, whether concealed or openly.
"Stand your ground" governs U.S. federal case law in which right of self-defense is asserted against a charge of criminal homicide. The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Beard v. U.S. (158 U.S. 550(1895)) that a man who was "on his premises" when he came under attack and "...did not provoke the assault, and had at the time reasonable grounds to believe, and in good faith believed, that the deceased intended to take his life, or do him great bodily harm...was not obliged to retreat, nor to consider whether he could safely retreat, but was entitled to stand his ground."
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. declared in Brown v. United States (1921) (256 U.S. 335, 343 (16 May 1921)), a case that upheld the "no duty to retreat" maxim, that "detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife".



Sunday, July 14, 2013

END THIS GAME

When the media is focused on a 2nd degree murder trial and are ignoring two 1st degree mass murder trials that are going on at the same time, you have to ask yourself why?



IN ORDER FOR THE MEDIA TO SELL IT'S PRODUCT THEY NEED  TOP RATINGS AND IF THE RATINGS AREN'T ON TOP THE SPONSORS DROP THEM

SENSATIONALISM

IN ORDER FOR OBAMA AND HOLDER TO  RETRY ZIMMERMAN
THEY NEED 

 CIVIL UNREST

THE MEDIA AND THE ADMINISTRATION ARE PLAYING THE CITIZENS 

TELL OBAMA AND HOLDER 

END THIS GAME