If you’ve had “difficult” coworkers, you know that, after a while, it becomes impossible to tell if they are mean or just stupid. Like someone who keeps bumping into you on a bus or subway train as the car moves, you can’t tell for sure if they are messing with you or just completely oblivious to their surroundings. After a while, incompetence and malevolence produce the same effects and put you in the same bind if you don’t change the situation.
This strange unity between incompetence and evil goes a long way to explaining Hillary Clintons career. Yes, we all know she is “Crooked Hillary,” but so many times during this election year in my head I’ve called her “Hapless Hillary.” She can’t tell a joke to save her life. Her fashion sense is horrific, even to a caveman like myself. She is an awful, wooden, robotic speaker, with no genuine warmth even while taking a selfie. She honestly does not know how to use much of modern technology. And so on.
Obviously, we can see all those things I just listed in a “crooked” light, and we wouldn’t be wrong: she is not funny because she is a hollow soul; she probably dresses like she does to pretend she has masculine power (or to emulate an Asian dictator); she speaks robotically because she detests having to interact with “the masses,” and despises having to convince others of her obvious “greatness” (#ImWithHer, anyone?); and she never bothered to learn how to use technology or protect classified information because she doesn’t care about consequences in other people’s lives and is used to ordering her underlings to handle stuff like that for her. And so on.
During the final presidential debate, the two-headed Hapless Hillary/Crooked Clinton candidate did it again: she said something so stupid that she might as well have meant it to be evil. Or maybe she said something with crooked intent, but said it in such a public setting that she looks stupid. We can’t know her state of mind for sure, but one thing we do know is that Hillary shared classified military information with the entire world.
Unravel why Hillary does what she does? Good luck!Clinton, responding to opponent Donald Trump and a question posed by debate moderator Chris Wallace, boasted specific and “damaging” details about the United States’ nuclear response time to retaliate during a nuclear attack. Clinton said:“But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.”“Secretary Clinton proved tonight she is unfit to be commander-in-chief,” a top-ranking DOD intelligence source said. “What she did compromises our national security. She is cavalier and reckless and in my opinion should be detained and questioned so we can unravel why she did what she did.”
According to Pentagon sources, the information Clinton disseminated publicly is Top Secret intelligence governed under the U.S. Special Access Program (SAP) which dictates safeguards and protocols for accessing and discussing highly classified and Top Secret intelligence. The specific details of the country’s nuclear response time discussed by Clinton, sources said, are only known by a handful of individuals outside top military brass, including the following “need-to-know” (NTK) officials:
- President
- Vice President
- Secretary of State
- Secretary of Defense
- Secretary of Homeland Security
- Attorney General
- Director of National Intelligence
- CIA Director
- Deputy Secretary of State
- Deputy Secretary of Defense
- Special personnel designated solely by the President in writing
Sources said late Wednesday Clinton likely violated two different types of Dept. of Defense SAP protocols. Since nuclear response is part of the sensitive national plan for nuclear war operations, all of its schematics are covered under both “Intelligence SAPs” and “Operation and Support SAPs,” sources said. Both contain Top Secret information. …“It’s truly incredible that (nuclear) response time as part of an ERO (Emergency Response Option) is now out there in the public domain to our adversaries.”
Watch: Many Are FURIOUS Over What Secret Hillary Gave Away On Debate Stage – ‘Highly Classified’
Hillary Clinton cannot find her words or her grip when it comes to explaining her emails scandals. She was obviously unable and unfit to handle classified information. Thus, she exposed America to grace national danger.
VIA Western Journalism
During Wednesday night’s presidential debate, she gave new life to that concern with comments thatdisclosed the time-span of America’s response for launching nuclear weapons.
“The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so,” Clinton said.
“Secretary Clinton proved tonight she is unfit to be commander-in-chief,” the website True Pundit quoted a top-ranking Department of Defense intelligence source as saying. “What she did compromises our national security. She is cavalier and reckless and in my opinion should be detained and questioned so we can unravel why she did what she did.”
Twitter was abuzz with Clinton’s revelation.
Why did hillary give away nuclear response time on international television? Let me guess “she didn’t know it was classified” #DebateNight
— Joseph Shaw (@harpandjoseph) October 20, 2016
“Why is Hillary talking about the time it takes the U.S. to launch a nuclear strike against its enemies?” commented Kyle Becker on Independent Journal Review.
Sure, we get that you don’t like The Donald… but you’re talking about the time it takes the US to launch a nuclear strike against its enemies,” Becker continued.
No one caught that Crooked Hillary stated on LIVE TV what our NUKE RESPONSE TIME IS 4 MIN??@FoxNews @DRUDGE#debatenight #ChrisWallace
VIA Western Journalism
No one caught that Crooked Hillary stated on LIVE TV what our NUKE RESPONSE TIME IS 4 MIN??@FoxNews @DRUDGE#debatenight #ChrisWallace
“This four-minute figure may be ‘out there,’ but it’s certainly alarming how casually Hillary Clinton talks about sensitive matters of national security,” he added. “Almost as sloppy as hosting a private server without government security and transmitting classified and sensitive material via email.”
“Nice Hillary,” commented Andrew Mark Miller on Young Conservatives.
“Anything else you want to tell our enemies about our nuclear process?” he added. “What a disaster.”
Leaked Audio Reveals Clinton Privately Opposed Major US Nuclear Upgrade
In a leaked audio recording that surfaced, Hillary Clinton told supporters in February that she was likely to not sanction the trillion dollar nuclear upgrade project, according The Washington Free Beacon.
According to an audio recording of her comments from a private event in McLean, Virginia., Clinton revealed that she will not go ahead with the upgrade. "I certainly would be inclined to do that," she said when asked about pushing back the Long Range Stand-Off (LRSO) missile program.The audio, which was from the event attended by campaign supporters, was revealed by hackers who accessed the email account of a campaign staffer, according to the Free Beacon.
The question was asked by former assistant secretary of defense Andy Weber, who was in charge of the Pentagon's nuclear weapons programs. Weber, along with William Perry, who served as secretary of defense under President Bill Clinton, batted for the abolition of the LRSO (Long-Range Stand-Off) program.
"Will you cancel this program if President Obama doesn't in the next 11 months and lead the world in a ban on this particularly destabilizing, dangerous type of nuclear weapon?" Weber asked in the recording.
To which Clinton replied she would be "inclined" to do so. "The last thing we need are sophisticated cruise missiles that are nuclear armed," she said.
The 30-year nuclear upgrade program aims to "modernize" the U.S. nuclear arsenal and build a new generation of weapons and production facilities to last the nation well into the second half of the twenty-first century.
This plan includes redesigned nuclear warheads, new nuclear bombers, submarines, land-based missiles, weapons labs and production plants. The estimated cost of the project is $1 trillion.
Clinton earlier told a peace activist that the planned $1 trillion nuclear weapons modernization program "doesn't make sense", according to The Huffington Post
Scrapping the program will not go down well with the Obama administration, which is confident of the result and boost for the country.
The State Department has confirmed via emails in response to Freedom of Information Act requests that "Clinton was briefed on aspects of the LRSO debate while serving as secretary of state."
"Do you oppose plans to spend a trillion dollars on an entire new generation of nuclear weapons systems that will enrich the military contractors and set off a new global arms race?" she was asked.
Clinton responded, "Yeah I've heard about that. I'm going to look into that. That doesn't make sense to me."
Meanwhile, former Air Force launch officer John Noonan said he did not agree that Clinton opposed the LRSO program. "There's been tremendous advancements in Russian and Chinese cruise missiles, coupled with an atrophy in American capability," Noonan said.
"The Obama Administration, to their credit, has acknowledged this and have budgeted for the LRSO," he said. "A President Clinton's Pentagon will be faced with the same tough reality."
In response to Clinton's reply to Weber in February, Noonan said she was "just petting a donor on the head and telling him he's pretty."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.