6 Ways Benghazi Proves Hillary Should Never Be President

I was told I need a disclaimer on this blog. That my blog is a lie by the Hillary and Obama people. That I am a lie. Interesting when the truth of the matter is thrown into these Hillary and Obama's clowns faces they being to conjure up all sorts of insults thinking this is going to stop you, It only confirms I am right with your threats and certifiable lies .
from
http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/the-benghazi-cover-rup/

Truth Wins: The Benghazi Cover-Up is Beginning to Collapse

Though still treading lightly, Democrats appear to be backing away from President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over their handling of the Benghaziterror attack and their past comments. This has taken many people by surprise because, up to this point, theDemocrats as a group have largely supported the Obama administration’s explanation of Benghazi and blamed the Republicans for trying to create a scandal where there is none.

Several prominent Democrats have appeared on Sunday morning news shows, including Fox News Sunday and Meet the Press, to discuss the various facts that have come to light as a result of an ongoing investigation into the Benghazi embassyattack.

The list of Democrats backing away from Obama is growing and includesRepresentative Stephen Lynch (D-MA), who is on the Government Oversight Committee, and Representative Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD), who is the Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee. This is still just thebeginning. Watch the interviews below:

Stephen Lynch (D-MA) admits that the Benghazi Talking Points were simply false

Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD), also conceded that the reports were edited in order to reflect something that wasn’t true, though he claims this was during a “volatile” time. Don’t expect these Democrats to be the last.

The media is turning on Obama and Hillary as well, though not fully, yet. Remember, almost any level of criticism is a step in the right direction, considering the media has been acting as the “fourth branch” of government for the last four years.

The Democratic concerns emanate from the fact that the CIA talking points explaining the circumstances surrounding the Benghazi embassy attack were changed by the Obama Administration to eliminate mention of Islamic terrorism. This raises the question of whether the changes were meant to cover up catastrophic decisions by the State Department concerning embassy support and security. I think we know the answer: yes.

The level of incompetence, sheer evil, and negligence on Hillary’s part is simply breath taking. The fact that millions of Americans still want her to be president is an example of the philosophical sickness that’s eating away at America’s moral fabric

6 Ways Benghazi Proves Hillary Should Never Be President

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appears to be the front runner for the Democratic nomination to run for President in 2016, despite the fact that her actions surrounding the terror attack on theBenghazi Consulate prove she shouldn’t be allowed to run a non-profit, much less a whole administration.

The entire Obama Administration has handled the attack poorly, but Hillary should shoulder most of the blame, due to her position and involvement.

The American people need only to look at her behavior before, during and afterBenghazi to know how she would handle a similar crisis if she were to be elected President. If anything, we should be looking for ways to file criminal charges — not give her the most powerful political office on earth.

1. She blatantly lied. Hillary Clinton deliberately lied about the cause of theattack. The American people were told that the attack was the result of a spontaneous riot in protest of a little-seen Youtube video that spun out of control. Anyone could see that it was obviously a planned assault by a terrorist outfit. Yet, Hillary and other members of the administration blamed the video for over a month.

2. She said it didn’t “matter”. When Hillary finally found time to testify before Congress about the Benghazi attack, she claimed that her lies did not matter. Despite multiple Congressmen pointing out facts of the attack that disproved the administrations narrative, she arrogantly dismissed their questions.

Pressed by Senator Johnson about why she had lied, she famously exploded “what difference, at this point, does it make?” She also lied under oath in these hearings, claiming she had no foreknowledge of the security situation in Benghazi. Documents and emails obtained from the State Department, bearing her signature, prove otherwise.

3. Her “investigation” was a fraud. After the attack, Hillary directed the StateDepartment to conduct an internal investigation into what went wrong. That was like having a criminal on trial act as his own prosecutor, judge and jury.

The fraudulent investigation discovered nothing noteworthy, mostly because it did not interview any of the survivors of the attack, nor any of the high-ranking State Department officials involved. Sticking only to interviewing mid-level and insulated employees, the investigation served only as an attempt to cover-up Hillary’s mistakes.

4. She could have stopped the attack. New evidence and information have revealed that the Benghazi attack could have been stopped. Numerous documents and emails show that the State Department, including Hillary Clinton, were well aware of the dangerous lack of security at the Consulate, yet they did nothing to remedy the situation.

Furthermore, anonymous special ops witnesses and whistleblower survivors have said that military assets were near the region and could have easily reachedBenghazi in time to save lives and prevent the second attack.

5. She has silenced whistle blowers. The White House has censored the truth about what happened in Benghazi, helped along by the complicit mainstream media. From the beginning, all attempts to uncover the truth have been stonewalled at every turn and met with lies, half-truths, or silence.

Witnesses have been hidden. The few who have stepped forward claim they were threatened to remain silent. Certain members of the military who may have spoken out about Benghazi have died, disappeared, or fallen from public view in disgrace. By all appearances it seems the White House, and Hillary Clinton, are involved in a full-scale cover-up.

6. She had no plan for defense. It is now quite obvious that Hillary had no plan for dealing with an attack like Benghazi. From the ignoring of prior threats andattacks before 9/11 and the removal of a highly trained security force, to the denial of requests for additional security measures and the lack of communication betweenthe State Department and the military, it is apparent that Hillary Clinton is quite incompetent when it comes to securing the interests of America and the lives of Americans serving those interests abroad.

Can we take the risk of expecting her to be any more competent in dealing with a similar situation as President? The answer is obvious. Keep that woman out of the White House, whatever it takes.

Vote for Loretta Miller visit www.LorettaMiller4President.com