Funny how this trail was over the weekend of Congress was going to bring to the floor The Impeachment of Obama and these March Riots began.

If they try to re-try Zimmerman the previous trial already included racial profiling. This was mentioned several times by the prosecution and the witness Rachel Jeantel mentioned “White Ass Cracker” which automatically showed that Martin with the aid and abetting of Jeantel repeating the statement to Trayvon caused Trayvon to become aggressive.She also injected that Zimmerman may be a sexual predator  out to rape Trayvon. She didn't use the word Predator but sex pervert. Therefore she is as guilty of a hate crime as Trayvon in fact more guilty since she is considered to be an adult. Jeantel admitting she used this term openly and at all occasions that she is guilty of racial profiling all Caucasians.

Since Racial profiling was mentioned in court and the prosecution dismissed Rachel Jeantel’s comment of “White Ass Cracker” as racial profiling but as freedom of speech then Zimmerman’s comments that “they always get away” is also freedom of speech since he did not say blacks always get away. They meaning

plural pronoun, possessive their or theirs, objective them.

1.

nominative plural of he, she, and it.

2.

people in general: They say he's rich.

3.

(used with an indefinite singular antecedent in place of the definite masculine he  or the definite feminine she  ): Whoever is of voting age, whether they are interested in politics or not, should vote.

The word the holds no racial terminology and is used commonly in the English Language. “They get away” refers to anyone who gets away. They has no color, race or sex but the Prosecution stated that Zimmerman was doing racial profiling.

However the New Black Panthers, which I see no difference in the Old compared to the New other than age and a regenerated hate group against Caucasians of all faiths with the direct attacks on Jews as demonstrated in this video below, stated Zimmerman was “a no good Jew”. Now that is Racial, Religious and discrimination against an ethnic group This was said on Camera and needs to be addressed as a Hate Crime under the Civil Rights laws.



 

According to Holder and Obama they (and the word they is not racial) want to retry Zimmerman. Under the Constitution of the United States this is against Zimmerman's  is guaranteed rights under the 5th Amendment. This would be Double Jeopardy since Racial Profiling was brought up during the trial.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

I think this is very clear to Holder since he used the fifth and advised witness when he went before Congress to use the 5th . Holder is an expert on using the 5th.
Double Jeopardy

[N]or shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb ...

The Double Jeopardy Clause encompasses four distinct prohibitions: subsequent prosecution after acquittal, subsequent prosecution after conviction, subsequent prosecution after certain mistrials, and multiple punishment in the same indictment. Jeopardy "attaches" when the jury is empaneled in a jury trial, when the first witness is sworn in during a bench trial, or when a plea is accepted unconditionally.

Prosecution after acquittal

The government is not permitted to appeal or try again after the entry of an acquittal, whether a directed verdict before the case is submitted to the jury, a directed verdict after a deadlocked jury,an appellate reversal for sufficiency (except by direct appeal to a higher appellate court), or an "implied acquittal" via conviction of a lesser included offense. In addition, the government is barred by collateral estoppel from re-litigating against the same defense, a fact necessarily found by the jury in a prior acquittal, even if the jury hung on other counts.

This principle does not prevent the government from appealing a pre-trial motion to dismiss or other non-merits dismissal,or a directed verdict after a jury conviction, nor does it prevent the trial judge from entertaining a motion for reconsideration of a directed verdict, if the jurisdiction has so provided by rule or statute. Nor does it prevent the government from retrying the defendant after an appellate reversal other than for sufficiency, including habeas,or "thirteenth juror" appellate reversals notwithstanding sufficiency on the principle that jeopardy has not "terminated." There may also be an exception for judicial bribery, but not jury bribery.

Multiple punishment, including prosecution after conviction

In Blockburger v. United States (1932), the Supreme Court announced the following test: the government may separately try and punish the defendant for two crimes if each crime contains an element that the other does not  Blockburger is the default rule, unless the legislatively intends to depart; for example, Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE) may be punished separately from its predicates, as can conspiracy.

The Blockburger test, originally developed in the multiple punishments context, is also the test for prosecution after conviction. In Grady v. Corbin (1990), the Court held that a double jeopardy violation could lie even where the Blockburger test was not satisfied, but Grady was overruled in United States v. Dixon (1993).

Prosecution after mistrial

The rule for mistrials depends upon who sought the mistrial. If the defendant moves for a mistrial, there is no bar to retrial, unless the prosecutor acted in "bad faith," i.e. goaded the defendant into moving for a mistrial because the government specifically wanted a mistrial. If the prosecutor moves for a mistrial, there is no bar to retrial if the trial judge finds "manifest necessity" for granting the mistrial. The same standard governs mistrials granted sua sponte.

The only reason Obama and Holder want this to be retried is because of political points with the New-Old Black Panther and the Sinister Ministers who hate Caucasians. This is not a trial about Martin this is a trail against Slavery that ended in 1871. The Black community who are “Americans” today never even experienced slavery. The Sinister Ministers claim that the poor Blacks are depressed yet these Black Leaders ride around in big cars, wear gold jewelry with diamonds and take money from the poor in the community. The poor community does their dirty work by going out and demonstrating, getting arrested and killing people because the Sinister Ministers incite them to do so. As long as the Sinister Ministers keep the black people uneducated, poor and in ghettos they force them in their slave army.

If Obama and Holder succeed in retrying Zimmerman, Obama and Holder open a Pandora’s Box of trials where Blacks raped Caucasians, Blacks killed Caucasians, all Black crime against Caucasians can be and will be retried as a Racial Profiling Case and that is life in Prison or hanging. This is not just for Blacks but for all races that have been tried in now and in the past years including OJ who killed his ex wife who was a Caucasian.

 But everyone is ignoring Gosnell Among his other medical work, Gosnell ran an abortion clinic and was a prolific prescriber of Oxycontin.In 2011, Gosnell, alongside various co-defendant employees, was charged with eight counts of murder resulting in part from gross medical malpractice in treatment of patients at his clinics, as well as several lesser offenses. The murder charges related to a patient who died while under his care and seven newborns said to have been killed after being born alive during attempted abortions. In May 2013, he was convicted on three of the murder charges and chose to waive his right of appeal in exchange for an agreement not to seek the death penalty. He was sentenced instead to life in prison without the possibility of parole. But we did not see mass demonstrations for the death penalty against Gosnell for his genocide against white and black babies. This was a trusted man in the community who murdered live born infants who have taken their first breath.These infants were humans born. But because this doctor was black the Black community did not out cry for the female victims and their families.And your Sinister Ministers, Obama and Holder ignore this. Holder could have had him tried on prescription drug trafficking. But because of Double Jeopardy Holder knew he couldn't.

 Now Obama who is a Muslim has no problem hanging a non-Muslim which according to Sharia Law is acceptable.

Funny how this trail was over the weekend of Congress was going to bring to the floor The Impeachment of Obama and these March Riots began. and Napolitaino resigns